[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is cm_print_error() intended to be a private function?
- Subject: Re: Is cm_print_error() intended to be a private function?
- From: Edward Baudrez <edward.baudrez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 22:17:56 +0200
- To: Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: cmocka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Done, sorry for the delay. Have a nice day! Edward On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, 18 April 2016 11:16:06 CEST Edward Baudrez wrote: >> Hi Andreas >> >> >> Not wanting to force anything, but you asked me to remind you after >> April 12th. My question is very simple actually (despite the length of >> my post :D): src/mocka.def suggests that cm_print_error() is a private >> function (by NOT listing it as exported), but it is very useful to >> create extensions, as I demonstrated in my post. Is the omission of >> cm_print_error() in src/mocka.def an oversight? >> >> Thank you very much for your work on cmocka, much appreciated! > > Yes, I think so. Please open a bug report and I will fix it! > > -- > Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D > www.cryptomilk.org asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|Re: Is cm_print_error() intended to be a private function?||Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|