[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is cm_print_error() intended to be a private function?
- Subject: Re: Is cm_print_error() intended to be a private function?
- From: Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 07:47:29 +0200
- To: Edward Baudrez <edward.baudrez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: cmocka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Monday, 18 April 2016 11:16:06 CEST Edward Baudrez wrote: > Hi Andreas > > > Not wanting to force anything, but you asked me to remind you after > April 12th. My question is very simple actually (despite the length of > my post :D): src/mocka.def suggests that cm_print_error() is a private > function (by NOT listing it as exported), but it is very useful to > create extensions, as I demonstrated in my post. Is the omission of > cm_print_error() in src/mocka.def an oversight? > > Thank you very much for your work on cmocka, much appreciated! Yes, I think so. Please open a bug report and I will fix it! -- Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D www.cryptomilk.org asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|Re: Is cm_print_error() intended to be a private function?||Edward Baudrez <edward.baudrez@xxxxxxxxx>|