[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Improvements in output to test results


> So looking at GTest for the format is probably a good idea.
I am not familiar with GTest. Better I will have a look on it.

I think may be we can implement some different format also which is simple
but yet attractive and informative.

thanks,
Abhishek


On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Sunday 03 March 2013 11:09:30 Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 March 2013 03:19:30 Abhishek Singh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I am Abhishek Singh. I am using this cmocka unit test frame work for
> unit
> > > testing. Cmocka being a very useful and worth unit testing frame-work,
> I
> > > feel that output pattern of cmocka should be more clear and  good
> looking.
> > > For example some of output should be colorized if the console supports
> > > colorization.
> > >
> > > Output for the tests which succeeds should show something like [    OK]
> > > and for failed tests it should show [   FAILED ]
> > >
> > > This is some idea which can be enhanced further. I am interested in
> doing
> > > it. Please give your suggestions.
> >
> > Sounds good. I think we need to check why they look like this. I think
> > initially someone did it the way it is for a parser. Not sure if it is a
> > standard but we should check first.
> >
>
> It matches the output of GTest. So looking at GTest for the format is
> probably
> a good idea.
>
>
>         -- andreas
>
> --
> Andreas Schneider                   GPG-ID: F33E3FC6
> www.cryptomilk.org                asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>

Follow-Ups:
Re: Improvements in output to test resultsAndreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
Improvements in output to test resultsAbhishek Singh <abhishekkumarsingh.cse@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: Improvements in output to test resultsAndreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Improvements in output to test resultsAndreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>