[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Improvements in output to test results

On Sunday 03 March 2013 11:09:30 Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Saturday 02 March 2013 03:19:30 Abhishek Singh wrote:
> > Hi,
> Hi,
> > I am Abhishek Singh. I am using this cmocka unit test frame work for unit
> > testing. Cmocka being a very useful and worth unit testing frame-work, I
> > feel that output pattern of cmocka should be more clear and  good looking.
> > For example some of output should be colorized if the console supports
> > colorization.
> > 
> > Output for the tests which succeeds should show something like [    OK]
> > and for failed tests it should show [   FAILED ]
> > 
> > This is some idea which can be enhanced further. I am interested in doing
> > it. Please give your suggestions.
> Sounds good. I think we need to check why they look like this. I think
> initially someone did it the way it is for a parser. Not sure if it is a
> standard but we should check first.

It matches the output of GTest. So looking at GTest for the format is probably 
a good idea.

 	-- andreas

Andreas Schneider                   GPG-ID: F33E3FC6
www.cryptomilk.org                asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Re: Improvements in output to test resultsAbhishek Singh <abhishekkumarsingh.cse@xxxxxxxxx>
Improvements in output to test resultsAbhishek Singh <abhishekkumarsingh.cse@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: Improvements in output to test resultsAndreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>